Superstition, Sciencestition, and How to Stop Overthinking Food

With the endless amount of contradictory nutrition information out there, it’s easy to become overwhelmed about making the “right” food choices. Well-meaning but misguided superstitions around food abound, as do exaggerated claims not backed by rigorous science. How can the average person separate fact from fiction to take a sane approach to eating? This article will explore common food superstitions, instances of “sciencestition”, and offer straightforward tips to stop fixating and simply enjoy wholesome foods.

What is a Food Superstition?

A food superstition is a belief, custom or taboo around food that lacks scientific backing. Oftentimes, food superstitions arise from folklore, traditions, or intuitive assumptions that get passed on through generations. Examples of common food superstitions include:

– Carrots improve night vision – This WWII myth arose to explain British pilots’ success, not actual night vision benefits of carrots. Carrots do provide vitamin A needed for healthy vision.

– An apple a day keeps the doctor away – Apples offer antioxidants and fiber but this saying is an overgeneralization. A varied, balanced diet is ideal.

– Avoid cold foods when sick – Many cultures prohibit cold foods when ill, but no evidence proves temperature affects immunity.

– Feed a cold, starve a fever – This folk remedy for illness has no scientific basis for effectiveness. Nourishment is important when sick either way.

– Breakfast is the most important meal – Skipping breakfast works for some people. What truly matters is your overall daily nutrition.

– Eating late causes weight gain – Total calories matter more than timing. Eating at night does not inherently lead to fat accumulation.

These and many other nutrition myths get repeated as fact due to tradition more than data. Relying too heavily on unproven food folklore can lead to unnecessary anxiety about making the “right” choice.

Where Do Food Superstitions Come From?

Some common sources food superstitions arise from include:

– Tradition – Beliefs get culturally ingrained from repetition over generations. Advice like “feed a cold” has been passed on for ages.

– Folklore – Stories like carrots improving night vision that arise and propagate informally.

– Intuition – Seems right intuitively so it feels true, like the idea you “should” eat breakfast to start the day right.

– Observational thinking – Anecdotes about what seems to work draw invalid causal conclusions. For instance, believing chicken soup fights colds because it’s soothing.

– Marketing – Companies leverage mysticism around products for commercial gain, like POM pomegranate products “boosting” immunity.

– Sound logic but wrong conclusion – For example, because vitamin C boosts immunity and oranges contain it, oranges themselves must prevent colds.

Understanding the origin of common food superstitions helps recognize that while they arise from reasonable places, the conclusions drawn lack rigorous scientific support.

Why Do People Believe in Food Superstitions?

Several reasons explain why food superstitions manage to endure:

– Simple to grasp – Reductive concepts like “nightshade veggies are unhealthy” seem straightforward, even if incorrect. Nuance is complex.

– Sense of control – Following food rituals provides a feeling you’re in control of outcomes like immunity.

– Comforting – Viewing food as having mystical properties is often psychologically reassuring.

– Cultural identity – Traditions around food superstitions convey a sense of belonging.

– Easy to spread – The rise of social media accelerates proliferation of bite-sized folklore whether accurate or not.

– Kernels of truth – Misconstrued science on topics like gluten or MSG makes overstated claims easy to believe.

The clarity, comfort and community food superstitions provide make them stubborn to shake, even when founded on falsehoods.

Problems with Food Superstitions

While innocuous in some cases, relying too heavily on unproven food folklore can negatively impact health in several ways:

– Orthorexia – Fixating on rigid rules around eating can lead to an unhealthy obsession that causes anxiety.

– Dietary deficiencies – Avoiding foods like nightshades due to myths can prevent getting adequate nutrition.

– Eating disorder risks – Black-and-white food rules increase risks of developing eating disorders.

– Confusion – Contradictory claims about what foods are “good” or “bad” leads to uncertainty about how to eat.

– Reductionist thinking – Viewing single foods in isolation oversimplifies their effects. Overall balanced diet matters more.

– Opportunity costs – Time and mental energy spent worrying over food rules reduces time for positive activities.

– False attribution – Crediting superfoods rather than adequate rest, exercise, sleep and healthcare for wellbeing.

Relying too heavily on unproven food folklore does more harm than good for overall wellness.

What is Sciencestition?

At the other end of the spectrum from superstition is “sciencestition” – exaggerated findings or clinical studies sponsored by industry that get spun as health gospel but lack adequate supporting evidence. Some troubling examples of sciencestition include:

– Many headlines about the latest superfood found to “boost weight loss” or “reduce cancer risk” that extrapolate beyond what limited studies actually prove.

– Claims demonizing common foods like eggs or meat based on associational data but ignoring contradictory findings.

– Industry-funded studies on supplements like probiotics that get used for marketing copy but have questionable study designs.

– Taking in vitro studies (“promising cell study shows turmeric reduces inflammation!”) and claiming benefits in humans that haven’t been demonstrated by rigorous clinical research.

– Using rat or mice trials on polyphenols or other compounds to promote supplements without human data.

– Bold conclusions from tiny underpowered studies, animal research, or correlational data that get presented as definitive facts.

In essence, sciencestition refers to taking limited scientific tidbits and weaving them into simplified narratives that overstate their proven benefits for marketing or headlines.

Problems with Sciencestition

Exaggerated health claims around foods enabled by sciencestition can be problematic because:

– They often solely highlight the benefits, ignoring potential risks or downsides. For example, supplements like high dose vitamin E that may interact with medications or increase mortality risk.

– Limited evidence gets accepted broadly before adequately replicated.

– Nuances are glossed over, like differences between whole turmeric versus isolated curcumin.

– Can ascribe positive impacts to single compounds or ingredients when synergistic effect of whole foods matter more.

– Generates distrust when seemingly contradictory findings emerge about the same food, leading to confusion.

– Creates unhealthy fixation on obtaining supposed “superfoods” rather than eating varied whole foods.

– Enables commercial exploitation by companies using marketing claims without sufficient evidence.

Relying on preliminary findings or biased claims contributes to nutrition confusion and detracts focus from proven foundations of healthy eating.

How to Spot Shaky Nutrition Science

Given all the questionable studies and headlines that get spun into rigid food rules, how can you discern legitimate nutrition advice from exaggerated claims? Watch for these red flags:

– Based on animal/lab research alone – Dramatic effects in rats or cells don’t always translate to humans.

– Tiny sample sizes – Any study with less than 50-100 participants warrants skepticism.

– Short study duration – Lasting only weeks or months fails to capture long-term impacts.

– No control group – Comparing results to a placebo group is key to validate effects.

– Reliance on questionnaires – Self-reported data is not as scientifically valid as measured outcomes.

– Sponsored by the food/supplement company – Financial conflict of interest may bias findings.

– Singles out one compound – Reductionist focus on one chemical vs. whole foods is limited.

– Just an association – Correlations do not prove direct causative effects.

– Exaggerated media coverage – Tabloid hype blowing limited results out of proportion.

Maintaining skepticism helps balance trust in science with recognition of its limitations and commercial interests that often drive research.

Tips to Stop Overthinking Food

Given the abundance of questionable science and food folklore, how can you take a sensible approach to eating without overthinking every bite? Here are some key strategies:

1. Focus on foundations first – Emphasize getting adequate whole foods, vegetables, fiber, fluids, physical activity and rest more than obsessing perfectionism around food rules.

2. Consider risks and benefits – Rather than reacting to bold headlines, evaluate the existing evidence on both sides.

3. Recognize limitations – Be wary of claims from pilot studies, animal research or weak associations. Seek out meta-analyses and systematic reviews when possible.

4. Watch for red flags – Be skeptical of fad products with dramatic claims of “miraculous” benefits.

5. Avoid oversimplification – Isolated compounds rarely convey the full picture. The interplay of nutrients and synergies matter.

6. Question underlying motives – Who funded or benefits from a study proclaiming supposed benefits of a food or supplement?

7. Take a timeless approach – Enduring healthy eating patterns like the Mediterranean diet offer time-tested guidance.

8. Remember trade-offs – Perfect eating is impossible. Overthinking often impedes enjoying social meals.

9. Trust your instincts – After assessing evidence and advice, let your intuitive wisdom guide choices.

10. Focus on how food makes you feel – Pay attention to how foods physically impact your energy, mood, and function.

Centering foundations and moderation rather than getting swept up in fads and fear-mongering enables a balanced, minimally stressful relationship with food.

The Bottom Line

In a world saturated with diet misinformation and extremes, cultivating healthy skepticism serves to counter unhelpful food superstitions and exaggerated science. Misleading studies make splashy headlines, while nuanced truths around eating for wellness rarely draw fanfare. With an understanding of food folklore origins and scientific limitation, you can take a reasoned approach focused on varied whole foods, listen to your body’s signals, and simply nourish yourself through a balanced diet rich in plants and nutrients. Rather than endlessly debating every food choice, remember that the pleasures of shared meals have inherent value for your mind and spirit as well.

About The Author